Effect of Spiritual Care Program on Quality of Life in Patients with Heart Failure

Document Type : Original Quantitative and Qualitative Research Paper

Authors

1 MSc Student of Critical Care Nursing, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Fellowship in Heart Failure and Transplantation Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Ph.D. in Nursing Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Associate Professor, M.D., Fellowship in Heart Failure and Transplantation Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

5 Assistant Professor, Ph.D. in Islamic Ethics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran

6 Assistant Professor of Biostatistics, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) is the common result of most heart disorders. The quality of life (QoL) of these patients is severely impaired and they need continuous care. Spiritual care is a type of nursing care that may affect the QoL of patients.
Aim: The present study aimed to determine the effect of spiritual care program on QoL in patients with HF.
Method: This randomized controlled trial was performed at Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Tehran, Iran in August 2020. In total, 84 patients were selected through convenient sampling and randomly assigned to two groups using block balanced randomization. Iranian Heart Failure Quality of Life (IHF-QoL) questionnaire and Parsian and Dunning spirituality questionnaire were complemented by the two groups before and after 1-month follow-up. The intervention was performed for the intervention group in two virtual educational sessions (each 1.5 h) as well as a 1-month follow-up three times a week for 1 h per session via WhatsApp. Finally, the data of 74 patients were analyzed using SPSS software (version 22). The significance level was considered at P < 0.05.
Results: The groups were homogenous in terms of demographic characteristics. Dimensions of QoL in mental limitations (P<0.001) and self-care (P<0.01) were significant in the intervention group, compared to the control group. Therefore, the spiritual care program significantly increased the total score of QoL (P<0.01).
Implications for Practice: Results of the study indicated that the spiritual care program greatly improved the total score of QoL and can be considered a part of the holistic care program.

Keywords


Introduction

Heart failure (HF) is a functional disorder of the ventricle during filling and emptying which reduces the ability of the heart to meet the metabolic needs, and causes dyspnea, fatigue, peripheral edema, and functional decline (1). HF is one of the most prevalent cardiovascular disorders. The prevalence of HF is increasing, despite recent advances in technical diagnostic tools and therapeutic methods, as it affects approximately 26 million individuals worldwide (2). According to a recent report, about 6.5 million individuals suffer from HF in the USA, and thousands of new cases are also diagnosed every year (3). In Iran, over one million individuals and about 1% of all adults over 40 years are affected by HF (4). HF is a main factor of mortality due to its complications around the world (5).

It should be noted that HF affects the quality of life (QoL) (6). The QoL is the perception of an individual from hope, physical, social, psychological, health status, and satisfaction (7). In other words, QoL is a culture-based logical process that summarizes values, beliefs, symbols, and experiences shaped by the culture, and provides a path to recognize conditions and experiences in human life (8). Finally, despite various descriptions presented for QoL, there is no consensus on this concept. In the present century, QoL is one of the major concerns of health experts and is recognized as an indicator for measuring health status in health-related research. In this regard, the present study aimed to investigate QoL and obtained results to empower individuals to live with more pleasure and meaning (9). Patients with HF failed to have a qualified QoL as HF impairs QoL more than any other chronic disease (10).

Spiritual care is the main factor in nursing that determines how individuals react to their disease and is the most important factor to achieve balance in preserving health and disease (7). Spiritual care can be effective in the QoL of patients with chronic diseases by decreasing anxiety and depression and promoting adaptation mechanisms in them (11, 12). In other words, religion and spirituality are considered important sources of physical and psychological adaptation for those with chronic diseases (13). Florence Nightingale has always emphasized that considering the spiritual and mental dimensions of the patients is necessary for nurses. In addition, nurses were asked to be committed to the concept of holistic care and understand the importance of considering physical, mental, emotional, social, spiritual dimensions, and the meaning of demands and cares (14). Although most nurses consider spiritual care an important part of holistic care, only about 28% of them practice regularly, and about half of them rarely perform spiritual care, and in most cases, it is neglected (15). In this regard, spiritual care has been considered by healthcare providers in recent years (16).

The study on the effect of religious intervention based on Tavasol prayer indicated that QoL and mental status of the patients with permanent pacemakers significantly improved by this intervention (17). Results of the aforementioned study revealed that spiritual care decreased death anxiety in patients with heart disease admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (18). Results of another study indicated that spiritual care reduced pain in patients undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) (19). Another study conducted in 2018 showed that group spirituality therapy improved QoL and spiritual health of patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in Ahvaz (20). Results of another study showed that spiritual therapy promoted QoL in women with breast cancer in Tehran, Iran (21).    

The QoL in HF patients is lower than those with other chronic diseases. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic negatively affects the QoL of patients (22, 23). COVID-19 causes numerous challenges including pain, fear, loneliness, and a near-death experience for everyone, especially patients (23, 24). In addition, patients are asked to consider their spiritual needs especially in critical conditions (25). Various studies have been conducted on the effect of spiritual care programs on QoL in coronary artery diseases, permanent pacemakers, or myocardial infarction which are a small part of the HF research community. Limited studies, to the best of our knowledge, are available on the effect of spiritual interventions on QoL in HF patients whose QoL is severely impaired, compared to other chronic diseases, such as cancer or MS, especially in critical conditions. Furthermore, most of the previous interventions are based on prayer therapy. However, in the present study, music therapy and listening to the sound of nature via CD have been used as well as prayer therapy. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the effect of spiritual care program on QoL in HF patients.

 

Methods

Number of eligible patients: 84 individuals

Enrollment

Randomizing: 84 individuals

Allocation

 

 

Control group: Receiving routine care (n=42)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intervention group: Receiving spiritual care program (n=42)

 individuals)

                                                                                                       

 

Excluded due to lack of cooperation and incorrect contact number (n=5)

 

Analyzed: 37 individuals

 

Excluded due to lack of cooperation and hospitalization (n=5)

 

Analyzed: 37 individuals

Follow-up

Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 1. Consort flow diagram of the participants

 

with self was through reinforcing the importance of self-esteem and patience, reading prayers related to the increase of patience. Communication with others was through forgiveness, charity, goodness to develop relationships with people. Finally,  communication with nature was through looking at the water and trees, listening to the song of birds, using bright and joyous colors, being kind to animals and growing plants, and using perfumes (30).

Prayer therapy was also used to strengthen self-esteem, forgiveness, and thanksgiving using the praying book. One of the CDs was Mozart’s symphonies which the patient listened to every night for 1 month (31). The other was the sound of nature which the patient listened to for 15 min in the morning or afternoon for 1 month (32). The first session was about the importance of the relationship with God and oneself and listening to a section of each CD at the end of the session. The second session was on the importance of connecting with others and nature and listening to a part of each CD at the end.

Ethical issues, such as plagiarism, informed consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and/or submission, and redundancy have been completely observed by the authors.

After finishing the 1-month follow-up, the spiritual care program was performed in two educational sessions of 1.5 h. The intervention was followed up after 1 month with 1-h sessions three times per week to practice spiritual care for the control group via WhatsApp. The collected data were analyzed in SPSS software (version 22.0). The quantitative and qualitative data were expressed as “mean± standard deviation (SD)” and “frequency (percentage)”, respectively. An independent two-sample t-test was used to compare quantitative variables in two groups.

Additionally, the Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare the frequency of qualitative variables. The QoL dimensions and total score of QoL were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention using the paired t-test. In addition, Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) and a total score of Qol Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was used to compare QoL dimensions after 1-month follow-up in two groups. Moreover, a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 

Results

The mean±SD of the age of the intervention and control groups were 46.27±11.24 and 51.11±10.49, respectively (P=0.060). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of demographic and disease information as can be seen in Table 1.

Table 1. Demographic characteristics and disease information in patients with heart failure in intervention and control groups.

P-value

Group

Variable

(37=n) Intervention

N (%)

(37=n)Control

(%) N

0.469*

 

15 (40.5)

22 (59.5)

 

12 (32.4)

25 (67.6)

Gender

  Female

  Male

0.107**

 

36 (97.3)

1 (2.7)

 

31 (83.8)

6 (16.2)

Marital Status

  Married

  Single

0.552**

 

3 (8.1)

5 (13.5)

17 (45.9)

12 (32.4)

 

5 (13.5)***

9 (24.31)

13 (35.1)

10 (27.0)

Education

  Primary school

  Middle school

  High school

  College education

 

 

 

 

0.052**

 

25 (67.6)

11 (29.7)

1 (2.7)

 

24 (64.9)

6 (16.2)

7 (18.9)

Living with

  Wife and children

  Wife

  Others

 

 

 

 

1.000*

 

18 (48.6)

19 (51.4)

 

18 (48.6)

19 (51.4)

Residence

  Tehran

  Town

 

 

 

 

0.764*

 

13 (35.1)

13 (35.1)

6 (16.2)

5 (13.5)

 

15 (40.5)

9 (24.3)

8 (21.6)

5 (13.5)

Occupation   

  Employed

  Housewife

  Retired

  Unemployed

 

 

 

 

 

0.099**

0.601*

0.782 *

 

4 (10.8)

11 (29.7)

9 (24.3)

 

3 (8.1)

9 (24.3)

8 (21.6)

Underline disease

  Diabetes

  High blood pressure

  Hyperlipidemia

0.407**

7 (18.9)

10 (27.0)

Cigarette smoking history

0.999**

4 (10.8)

5 (13.5)

History of drug use

*Chi-squared test, **Fisher’s exact

 

The mean±SD of the ejection fraction of the intervention and control groups were 25.81±5.21 and 24.73±4.85, respectively. A two-sample independent t-test indicated that ejection fraction was not significantly different between the intervention and control groups (P=0.359). Findings also showed that the mean±SD of spirituality scores before intervention were 91.76±10.29 and 90.05±11.84 in the intervention and control group, respectively (P=0.511). Moreover, after the intervention, the mean±SD of spirituality scores were 94.08±10.18 and 89.35±11.40 in the intervention and control groups, respectively (P=0.060). Additionally, the mean±SD changes of spirituality scores in the intervention and control groups were 2.32±2.33 and -0.70±1.54, respectively (P<0.001). Accordingly, it was found that the spirituality score increased in the intervention group, while it decreased in the control group after the intervention.

The comparison of the mean±SD total QoL score and its dimensions in two groups before and after the intervention without adjusting the effect of confounding variables (Qol and spirituality score) before intervention is shown in Table 2. Presumptions of the tests were assessed through MANCOVA before analyzing the data. Results of the Shapiro-Wilk test showed that frequency distribution scores of QoL dimensions in intervention and control groups were normal before and after a 1-month follow-up (P>0.05).

In addition, Box’s M test indicated that the assumption of the equality of covariance matrices is confirmed in the studied groups (F=0.906, P=0.690). Besides, Levene’s test also represented that assumption of the equality of variances scores of QoL dimensions is approved in the studied groups (P>0.05). Moreover, the two-by-two correlation coefficient of different dimensions of QoL ranged from 0.250 to 0.580 after the intervention which indicates a positive and moderate correlation between dimensions of QoL.

 

Table 2. Comparison of the mean±SD total quality of life score and its dimensions in two groups before and after the intervention.

Group

Variable                                     

Intervention

Control

Time

P-value*

After intervention

Before

P-value*

After intervention

Before

 

0.584

0.343

<0.001

0.169

0.160

0.711

 

14.05±3.33

11.70±2.69

7.68±1.56

8.46±1.61

5.84±0.44

2.41±0.60

 

13.97±3.36

11.84±2.68

6.00±1.99

8.59±1.54

5.78±0.58

2.38±0.68

 

0.812

0.183

<0.01

<0.05

1.000

0.324

 

13.65±3.48

11.24±2.44

5.68±1.77

7.95±1.76

5.68±0.67

2.32±0.63

 

13.62±3.55

11.32±2.55

6.03±1.82

8.19±1.87

5.68±0.67

2.35±0.59

Dimensions of QoL

Disease severity

Physical limitations

Mental limitations

Social

Self-care

Total satisfaction of QoL

<0.001

50.14±7.32

48.57±7.64

<0.01

46.51±7.97

47.19±8.23

Total QoL score

*paired t-test, QoL: quality of life

 

The results of Pillai’s trace test, Wilks’ Lambda test, Hoteling’s trace test, and Roy’s Largest Root on the difference of intervention and control groups were significant as P<0.001 in dimensions of QoL in patients with HF. The two groups were significantly and statistically different in at least one dimension of QoL (P<0.001). In addition, values of Partial Eta Squared showed that about 70% of difference (changes) scores of Qol dimensions in two groups after 1-month follow-up is caused by the intervention (spiritual care program).

After adjusting the effect of confounding variables before the intervention, the effects of the intervention on the dimensions of mental limitations and awareness on disease and self-care of QoL were statistically significant (P<0.05). In addition, Eta squared value in the dimension of mental limitations showed that about 80% of the difference of mental limitations in the intervention group after 1-month follow-up was caused by the intervention (spirituality care program) (Table 3).

 

Table 3. Results of Multivariate Analysis of Covariance on dimensions of quality of life score after the intervention

Dimensions of Qol

Source of effect

Sum of squares

Degrees of freedom

Mean squares

Statistics

F

P-value

Eta squared

Test power

Severity of disease symptoms

Group

Before intervention

Spirituality Score

Error

Total

0.0635

201.451

0.6235

19.467

7517.5

1

1

1

60

74

0.0635

201.451

0.6235

0.3245

 

0.196

620.900

1.921

 

0.659

<0.001

0.171

 

0.533

0.912

0.201

 

0.402

1.000

0.276

 

Physical limitations

Group

Before intervention

Spirituality score

Error

Total

0.006

113.276

0.271

12.702

5109.5

1

1

1

60

74

0.006

113.276

0.271

0.2115

0.032

535.031

1.280

 

 

0.860

<0.001

0.262

 

0.401

0.899

0.210

 

0.540

1.000

0.200

 

Mental limitations

Group

Before intervention

Spirituality score

Error

Total

30.021

56.1955

0.738

19.784

1.786

1

1

1

60

74

30.21

56.1955

0.738

0.3295

91.048

170.428

2.238

 

<0.001

<0.001

0.140

 

0.802

0.740

0.306

 

1.000

1.000

0.313

 

Table 3. Continued

Social dimensions

Group

Before intervention

Spirituality score

Error

Total

0.0805

56.7065

0.256

9.5345

2594.5

1

1

1

60

74

0.0805

56.7065

0.256

0.159

0.507

356.858

1.611

 

0.479

<0.001

0.209

 

0.507

0.856

0.262

 

0.408

1.000

0.239

 

Self-care

Group

Before intervention

Spirituality score

Error

Total

0.082

7.254

0.0025

0.559

1.238

1

1

1

60

74

0.082

7.254

0.0025

0.0095

8.920

778.691

0.244

 

<0.01

<0.001

0.623

 

0.630

0.928

0.004

 

0.836

1.000

0.708

 

Total satisfaction of QOL

Group

Before intervention

Spirituality score

Error

Total

0.001

2.9895

0.0325

3.17

220.5

1

1

1

60

74

0.001

2.9895

0.0325

0.053

0.022

56.577

0.617

 

0.882

<0.001

0.435

 

0.487

0.758

0.100

 

0.522

1.000

0.121

 

QoL: quality of life

 

The ANCOVA presumptions of the tests were assessed before data analysis through Analysis of Covariance. Results of the Shapiro-Wilk test showed that the frequency distribution of QoL scores in two groups was normal before and after the 1-month follow-up (P>0.05). In addition, Levene’s test showed that the assumption of the equality of variances of QoL scores was approved in the studied groups (P>0.05). Group effects in QoL were statistically significant after adjusting the effect of confounding variables (Qol and spirituality score) before intervention (P<0.05). In addition, eta square on QoL indicated that 67.5% of the difference (changes) of total QoL score in two groups was caused by the intervention after one-month follow-up (spiritual care program) as can be presented in Table 4.

 

Table 4. Results of Analysis of Covariance on total QoL score after intervention

Variable

Source of effect

Sum of squares

Degrees of freedom

Mean squares

Statistics

F

P-value

Eta squared

Test power

Total QOL score

Group

Before intervention

Spirituality score

Error

Total

99.728

3986.045

0.585

194.986

4458.216

1

1

1

70

74

99.728

3986.045

0.585

2.786

35.806

1430.99

0.210

 

<0.001

<0.001

0.684

 

0.675

0.952

0.120

 

 

1.000

1.000

0.104

 

 

 

Discussion

The results indicated two dimensions of mental limitations and awareness of QoL significantly increased in the intervention group after a 1-month follow-up of the spiritual care program. Moreover, the total score of QoL significantly increased after finishing a 1-month follow-up of the spiritual care program in the intervention group, compared to the control group. Results of a study performed on the effect of the spiritual intervention on QoL with cardiovascular diseases indicated that spiritual intervention promoted the total score of QoL in adult patients (32). The aforementioned study was performed only on one group and the spiritual intervention was done based on spirituality score for each patient. The present study was conducted on two groups and the spiritual care program was equally performed for the intervention group without estimating the spirituality score.

According to another study, spiritual intervention based on "Tavasol Pray" significantly improved QoL and mental status of patients with a permanent pacemaker (19). Although the results of the aforementioned study are consistent with those of the present study, the method of increasing QoL in the present study was presented as prayer therapy and music therapy as well as listening to the sound of nature via CD. Results of the study in 2020 indicated that spirituality therapy had promoted QoL in elders with acute coronary arteries (33). The difference is that the above-mentioned study assessed the effect of spirituality therapy on QoL in elders with acute coronary arteries; however, the present study evaluated the effect of spiritual care program on QoL in young and elder HF patients.

Theory of Ghalbe Salim stated that spiritual intervention increased the QoL of patients with acute myocardial infarction (34). Another study performed in 2018 revealed that group spirituality therapy had promoted QoL and spiritual health of patients with MS in Ahvaz, Iran (20). Results of the study indicated that spirituality therapy had promoted QoL in women with breast cancer in Tehran (21). The discrepancy is that these two studies have been conducted on MS and breast cancer and the Qol of HF patients which is severely damaged more than any other chronic disease is neglected.

Regarding the dimensions of QoL, according to the study of Delaney, psychological dimensions and physical health was statistically significant in patients with cardiovascular diseases after 1 month of spirituality therapy intervention. However, there was no statistical change in two aspects of social and family relationships (32). The spirituality-based intervention consisted of music/imagery sessions using CDs. Participants were instructed to listen to the CD at least three times per week for four weeks. The present study improved the mental aspect of QoL which is consistent with Delaney’s study and failed to change the physical dimension which is inconsistent with that of Delaney.

Heravi indicated that spiritual care promoted aspects of physical health, social relationships, and mental health of QoL in patients with acute myocardial infarction in the intervention group after the 1-month intervention. However, the difference between the two dimensions of mental health and social relations was statistically significant (33). The results of a study showed that spirituality therapy improved the physical and mental dimension of QoL in patients with MS in Ahvaz. The intervention included five 60-min face-to-face sessions (20).

Another study investigated the results of the effectiveness of spiritual therapy on QoL of women with breast cancer in which the aspects of mental and physical health and social relations were statistically significant, however, the aspect of living environment was not significant (21). The intervention included twelve 60-min face-to-face sessions. The above-mentioned results are consistent with those of the present study in terms of improving the mental aspect of QoL, however, differ from them in other aspects which may have different reasons, such as type of research community, duration of intervention, and cultural-religious beliefs. The limitation of this study was that educational sessions were not held face to face due to stress and high mortality of COVID-19, and the completion of questionnaires by phone calls after 1-month follow-up, and the lack of enough collaboration or organization to implement the sessions.

 

Implications for Practice

According to the results, spiritual care programs increased the total score of QoL in the intervention group. Therefore, a spiritual care program is suggested as a comprehensive care approach in improving the QoL of chronic diseases, especially HF patients.

 

Acknowledgments

The present article was derived from a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Master’s Degree and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shahid Rajaie Cardiovascular and Medical Research Center under, Tehran, Iran (IR.RHC.REC.1399.042). It is also registered in the Iranian Clinical Trial Site (IRCT20201014049021N1). The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to all hospital officials and staff as well as the patients participating in the research.

 

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of the present study.

  1. Del Rio R. Quality of life and hospital readmissions among patients with NYHA class III heart failure following implantation of cardiomems™ sensor: a mixed methods study. New York: Sage Graduate School, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing; 2018.
  2. Chionh CY, Clementi A, Poh CB, Finkelstein FO, Cruz DN. The use of peritoneal dialysis in heart failure: a systematic review. Perit Dial Int. 2020;40(6):527-39.
  3. Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139(10):e56-28.
  4. Dalir Z, Reihani Z, Mazlom R, Vakilian F. Effect of training based on teach back method on self-care in patients with heart failure. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2016;25(134):209-20.
  5. Bhatt AS, Vaduganathan M, Butler J. Growing mismatch between evidence generation and implementation in heart failure. Am J 2020;133(5):525-7.
  6. Pinilla JMG, Díez-Villanueva P, Freire RB, Formiga F, Marcos MC, Bonanad C, et al. Consensus document and recommendations on palliative care in heart failure of the Heart Failure and Geriatric Cardiology Working Groups of the Spanish Society of Cardiology. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2020;73(1):69-77.
  7. Mazandarani H, Asadzandi M, Saffari M, Khaghanizadeh M. The effect of spiritual care based on sound heart model on quality of life in hemodialysis patients. J Psychiatry Behav Health Forecast. 2018;1(1):1006.
  8. Heidarzadeh M, Ghanavati A, Pashaie A, Kolahdoozipour J, Mohamad Karam A, Rahimzadeh A, et al. Quality of life in congestive heart failur patients: comparing with other groups. Iran J Nurs Res. 2015;10(2):54-62.
  9. Hosseini SH, Rajabzadeh R, Rezazadeh H, Almasi Hashiani A, Haresabadi M. Health-related quality of life in students of North khorasan University of Medical Sciences in 2011. J North Khorasan Univ Med Sci. 2014;5(5):1121-7.
  10. Eskandari S, Heravi-Karimooi M, Foroughan M, Ebadi A, Kharameh ZT. Quality of life in heart failure patients using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF). Payesh (Health Monitor). 2016;15(5):559-66.
  11. Koszycki D, Raab K, Aldosary F, Bradwejn J. A multifaith spiritually based interve ntion for generalized anxiety disorder: a pilot randomized trial. J Clin Psychol. 2010;66(4):430-41.
  12. Saffari M, Pakpour AH, Naderi MK, Koenig HG, Baldacchino DR, Piper CN. Spiritual coping, religiosity and quality of life: a study on M uslim patients undergoing haemodialysis. Nephrology. 2013;18(4):269-75.
  13. Büssing A, Koenig HG. Spiritual needs of patients with chronic diseases. Religions. 2010;
    1(1):18-27.
  14. Rahimi N, Nouhi E, Nakhaee N. Spiritual well-being and attitude toward spirituality and spiritual care in nursing and midwifery students. Iran J Nurs. 2013;26(85):55-65.
  15. Adib-Hajbaghery M, Saeadnejad Z. Barriers to provide patients admitted to hospitals in kashan with spiritual care: nurses’ viewpoints. Med Ethics J. 2016;10(37):49-59.
  16. Oshvandi K, Amini S, Moghimbeigi A, Sadeghian The effect of spiritual care on death anxiety in hemodialysis patients with end-stage of renal disease: a randomized clinical trial. Hayat. 2018;23(4):332-44.
  17. Naimi E, Eilami O, Babuei A, Rezaei K, Moslemirad M. The effect of religious intervention using prayer for quality of life and psychological status of patients with permanent pacemaker. J Religion Health. 2020;59(2):920-7.
  18. Azimian J, Soleimany MA, Pahlevan Sharif S, Banihashemi H. The effect of spiritual care program on death anxiety of cardiac patients: a randomized clinical trial. Avicenna J Nurs Midwifery Care. 2019;27(1):1-10.
  19. Soltani F, Chahqui M, Arab M, Hosseini SF, Dabbagh F. The effect of spiritual care on pain in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Iran J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017;5(4):20-1.
  20. Norouzi R, Elahi N. Effect of group spiritual therapy on quality of life and spiritual health on patients with multiple sclerosis in Ahvaz City, Iran. Jundishapur J Chronic Dis Care. 2018;7(4):e79853.
  21. Mohammad KM, Shariatnia Effectiveness of spiritual therapy on the life quality of the women with breast cancer in Tehran. J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Facul. 2017;15(2):107-18.
  22. Abbasi K, Mohammadi E, Sadeghian H, Gholami Fesharaki M. Quality of life in patients with heart failure. Iran J Nurs Res. 2016;11(2):10-23.
  23. Arab-Zozani M, Hashemi F, Safari H, Yousefi M, Ameri H. Health-related quality of life and its associated factors in COVID-19 patients. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2020;11(5):296-302.
  24. Heidari M, Heidari A, Yoosefee S. COVID-19 pandemic and the necessity of spiritual care. Iran J Psychiatry. 2020;15(3):262-3.
  25. Momeni Ghalehghasemi T, Musarezaie A, Moeini M, Naji Esfahani H. The effect of spiritual care program on Ischemic heart disease patients' anxiety. Hosp CCU Clin Trial. 2012;10(6):554-64.
  26. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JG, Coats AJ, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18:891-975.
  27. Naderi N, Bakhshandeh H, Amin A, Taghavi S, Dadashi M, Maleki M. Development and validation of the first Iranian questionnaire to assess quality of life in patients with heart failure: IHF-QoL. Res Cardiovasc Med. 2012;1(1):10-6.
  28. Parsian N, Dunning T. Developing and validating a questionnaire to measure spirituality: a psychometric process. Global J Health Sci. 2009;1(1):2-11.
  29. Khizarloo H, Akbari M, Jadidi H, Sinai B. Compilation of the relationship between psychosocial factors and self-efficacy of pain by mediating optimism and psychological hardiness in cancer patients. Iran Nurs Sci Assoc. 2019;7(2):75-82.
  30. Asadi M. The effect of spiritual care based on «GHALBE SALIM» model on spiritual experiences of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Iran J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013;2(2):30-9.
  31. Pauwels EK, Volterrani D, Mariani G, Kostkiewics M. Mozart, music and medicine. Med Princ Pract. 2014;23(5):403-12.
  32. Delaney C, Barrere C, Helming M. The influence of a spirituality-based intervention on quality of life, depression, and anxiety in community-dwelling adults with cardiovascular disease: a pilot study. J Holist 2011;29(1):21-32.
  33. Heravi M, Hatami M, Ahadi H. The effectiveness of spiritual therapy on quality of life in the elderly with acute coronary heart disease. Payesh. 2020;19(3):275-87.
  34. Babamohamadi H, Kadkhodaei-Elyaderani H, Ebrahimian AA, Ghorbani R, Tansaz Z. Effects of spiritual care based on GHALBE SALIM model on quality of life of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Koomesh. 2019;21(2):262-70.