Identification and assessment of common errors in the admission process of patients in the Central Emergency Department of Imam Reza Hospital applying the prospective approach of "Failure Mode Effects Analysis" (FMEA)

Document Type: Original Quantitative and Qualitative Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD candidate in Nursing, department of medical-surgical nursing, School of nursing and midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 MS in Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of Clinical toxicology and poisonings department, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

4 Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine department, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Background and Aim : Emergency ward is among hospital areas with high risk of errors, thus, implementing measures to identify and correct the errors is essential. The object of this study is to identify and assess the errors of the process of admitting patients in Emergency Department of Imam Reza Hospital using Failure Mode Effects Analysis, as one of the tools to assess and manage risk, as well as proposing actions to improve the process.
Method: In this descriptive study, the potential modes of error related to the admission process was evaluated and analyzed by FMEA methodology. The data was collected through group interviews and holding weekly meetings with group members using the techniques of brainstorming and fishbone diagram, and the results were registered in the final FMEA worksheet.
Results: Using FMEA methodology, 37 modes of potential errors in admission process of the Emergency Department were identified and analyzed, with the reliability of 85%, 13 modes of error with RPN≥140 as high risk errors were identified in three areas of errors related to nurses, doctors and errors associated with patients, then measures and solutions were proposed to reduce each of these errors.
Conclusion: Applying Failure Mode Effects Analysis in a critical and high demanding ward such as Emergency Department helps to identify and correct the errors, while proposed measures for each of the errors are highly applicable regarding team composition.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1. Thomoson R, Pryce A. Patient Safety: Epidemiological Considerations. In: Hurwitz B, Sheikh A, editors. Health Care Errors and Patient Safety. 1st ed. Oxford: Willy Blackwell; 2009:8

2. Wachter RM. Underestanding Patiant Safety. United State of America: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc; 2008: 10.

3. Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR, Orav EJ, Zeena T, Williams EJ, et al. Incidence and Types of Adverse Events and Negligent Care in Utah and Colorado. J Med Care. 2000; 38(3): 261-71.

4. Jafarian A, Parsapour AR, Haj-Tarkhani AH, Asghari F, Emami Razavi SH, Yalda AR. A Survey of the Complaints Entering the Medical Council Organization of Tehran in Three Time Periods. J Med Ethic His Med 2009; 2(2): 9 (Persian).

5. Spath PL. Using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis to Improve Patient Safety. AORN J 2003; 78(1):16-37

6. Bahadori M.K and et al. Assessment of Structure, Process and Activities in Emergency Ward of Bagheatallah Medical University Hospitals. J Tebe nezami. 2007; 9(4): 257-63

7. Gharachorlou N. Risk Assessment & Risk Management. Tehran: Oloom-o-Fonoon Publication; 2005: 16-49. (Persian)

8. Smith IJ. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Healthcare:Proactive Risk Reduction. 2nd ed. United States of America:Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) 2005; 1, 5, 12, 18-9.

9. Greenall J, Walsh D, Wickman K. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis: A Tool for Identifying Risk in Community Pharmacies. Can Pharm J .2007; 140:191-3.

10. Kunac DL, Reith DM. Identification of Priorities for Medication Safety in Neonatal Intensive Care. Drug Saf J .2005; 28(3):251-61.

11. Mirhaghi A.H, Roudbari M. A Survey on Knowledge Level of the Nurses about Hospital Triage. Iranian Journal of Critical Care Nursing. 2011; 3(4): 165-70

12. Goransson KE, Von Rosen A. Interrater agreement: A Comparison between Two Emergency Department Triage Scales. Eur J Emerg Med. 2010; 18(6): 83-8 Aug2.www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20679900

13. Malekshahi F, Mohammad zadeh M. Assessment of knowledge and Activity of Nurses in Triage of Patients with Trauma Admitted to Shohada Ashayer Hospital. Proceedings of the 6th Nationwide Congress of  Nursing and Midwifery; the Role of Nurses and Midwives in Emergency Medicine. 2004 Feb 24-25; Tehran, Iran. (Persian)

14. Andersson AK, Omberg M, Svedlund M. Triage in the Emergency Department – A Qualitative Study of the Factors Which Nurses Consider when Making Decisions. Journal of BACN  Nursing in Critical Care. 2006 Apr 20; 11(3): 136-45.

15. Golipoor K, Sabaghi R, Nasiri S, SHerkati S, Hassannegad N. Auditing the Credit of Conducted Triages in First Quarter at Tabriz Shahid Madani Hospital. First Clinical Audit and Quality Improvement Conference.2012; 8(4): 33-9

16. Considine J, Botti M, Thomas S. Do knowledge and Experience Have Specific Roles in TriageDecision-Making? Acad Emrge Med. 2007 Aug; 14(8):722-6.

17. Abbasi A, SHahri S, Emami A, Heshmati H. Analysis of Effective Causes and Risk Factors Culminating in Medical Malpractice and Errors and Ways to Prevent Them. First National Student Conference on Clinical Governance and Continuous Quality Improvement.2012; 1(3): 12-8

18. Kahooee M, Sadeghi F, Askarimagdabadi H. The Rate of Knowledge and Residents and Medical Students Practice in Semnan University of Medical Sciences than Documentation of Care Provided to Patients from the Perspective of the Forensic. Journal of  forensic Mwdicine.2007;13(2): 92 -7